Saturday, 11 May 2013

Nigeria 'baby factory' raided in Imo state



map

Related Stories

Seventeen pregnant teenage girls and 11 babies have been rescued from a house in Nigeria's south-eastern Imo state, police have said.
They say they are looking for a woman suspected of planning to sell the babies.
"The girls claimed they were fed once a day and were not allowed to leave the home," said spokeswoman Joy Elomoko.
It is not uncommon for such "baby factories" to be found in south-eastern Nigeria.
The rescued girls said they had all been made pregnant by a 23-year-old man, who has been arrested, reports the AFP news agency.
The European Union says Nigeria, along with China, is one of the biggest sources of people trafficked into Europe, where they are often forced into prostitution.
In 2011, the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (Naptip), said their investigations showed that babies are sold for up to $6,400 (£4,200) each.
Poor, unmarried women face tough choices if they get pregnant in Nigeria, often facing exclusion from society, correspondents say.
Naptip says desperate teenagers with unplanned pregnancies are sometimes lured to clinics and then forced to turn over their babies.
The babies can be sold for illegal adoption, used for child labour or prostitution or sometimes killed with their body parts used for ritual purposes.

More on This Story

Related Stories

From other news sites

Nigeria: Maiduguri hospital shut 'over police assault




Policeman inspects site at Bama in Nigeria (May 7 2013)Tuesday's assault on Bama by suspected Islamist militants left 55 people dead
Doctors have closed the main hospital in Nigeria's north-eastern city of Maiduguri in protest at alleged police assaults on staff and patients.
They say officers became angry because the hospital mortuary was too full to take the bodies of colleagues killed by suspected Islamist militants.
One doctor told the BBC they would not reopen the hospital to new patients until the government provided them with security to do their work in safety.
The police have not yet commented.
Maiduguri is the capital of Borno state, where the Islamist group Boko Haram is based and where it has waged a violent insurgency to create an Islamic state since 2010.
'Hospital vandalised'

Start Quote

Dead people don't keep oaths”
Dr Akpufouma PemThe Nigerian Medical Association
Fifty-five people died on Tuesday in a pre-dawn raid by suspected Boko Haram fighters to free prisoners in Bama, a town some 70km (44 miles) from Maiduguri.
A police station, military barracks and other government buildings were burned to the ground in the assault.
On Thursday, some of the slain bodies were taken to the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, but medical staff say angry scenes broke out when the police were told the mortuary was unable to accommodate all of the corpses.
The Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) said the siege at the hospital lasted for about five hours.
"This mayhem unleashed on innocent health workers of the hospital, including the acting chief medical director of the hospital, led to the vandalisation of the hospital properties, as well as health workers and patients of the hospital sustaining various degrees of injuries," the NMA said in a statement.
One doctor's leg was broken and another doctor was slapped, the president of the resident doctors, Dr Yahaya Muhammed, told the BBC's Hausa service.
He said the hospital gates were now closed and no new patients were being admitted until the authorities provided for their security.
Map
Some of the hospital's 300 doctors would attend to those patients already admitted, he said.
Dr Akpufouma Pemu, the NMA's secretary general, said the Hippocratic oath - by which doctors swear to uphold professional standards - was important, but that the doctors needed to be alive to care for their patients.
"Dead people don't keep oaths," he told the BBC's Focus on Africa programme.
"As it is now, it is the life of the doctor that is endangered so there is need for us to get some assurances from the security forces that any health worker who goes into that hospital is safe, will not be harassed, will not be brutalised," he said.
During Boko Haram's campaign of violence at least 2,000 people have been killed in northern and parts of central Nigeria.
Correspondents say the security forces have been criticised for using excessive force in their efforts to put down the insurgency.

More on This Story

Kofi Annan: Africa plundered by secret mining deals




Bauxite factory in mineral-rich Guinea (Archive shot)Under-pricing deprives Africa of much-needed money, the report says

Related Stories

Tax avoidance, secret mining deals and financial transfers are depriving Africa of the benefits of its resources boom, ex-UN chief Kofi Annan has said.
Firms that shift profits to lower tax jurisdictions cost Africa $38bn (£25bn) a year, says a report produced by a panel he heads.
"Africa loses twice as much money through these loopholes as it gets from donors," Mr Annan told the BBC.
It was like taking food off the tables of the poor, he said.
The Africa Progress Report is released every May - produced by a panel of 10 prominent figures, including former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo and Graca Machel, the wife of South African ex-President Nelson Mandela.
'Highly opaque'
African countries needed to improve governance and the world's richest nations should help introduce global rules on transparency and taxation, Mr Annan said.
The report gave the Democratic Republic of Congo as an example, where between 2010 and 2012 five under-priced mining concessions were sold in "highly opaque and secretive deals".
Kofi Annan: "Transparency is a powerful tool"
This cost the country, which the charity Save the Children said earlier this week was the world's worst place to be a mother, $1.3bn in revenues.
This figure was equivalent to double DR Congo's health and education budgets combined, the report said.
DR Congo's mining minister disputed the findings, saying the country had "lost nothing".
"These assets were ceded in total transparency," Martin Kabwelulu told Reuters news agency.
The report added that many mineral-rich countries needed "urgently to review the design of their tax regimes", which were designed to attract foreign investment when commodity prices were low.
It quotes a review in Zambia which found that between 2005 and 2009, 500,000 copper mine workers were paying a higher rate of tax than major multinational mining firms.
Africa loses more through what it calls "illicit outflows" than it gets in aid and foreign direct investment, it explains.
"We are not getting the revenues we deserve often because of either corrupt practices, transfer pricing, tax evasion and all sorts of activities that deprive us of our due," Mr Annan told the BBC's Newsday programme.
"Transparency is a powerful tool," he said, adding that the report was urging African leaders to put "accountability centre stage".
Mr Annan said African governments needed to insist that local companies became involved in mining deals and manage them in "such a way that it also creates employment".
"This Africa cannot do alone. The tax evasion, avoidance, secret bank accounts are problems for the world… so we all need to work together particularly the G8, as they meet next month, to work to ensure we have a multilateral solution to this crisis," he said.
For richer nations "if a company avoids tax or transfers the money to offshore account what they lose is revenues", Mr Annan said.
"Here on our continent, it affects the life of women and children - in effect in some situations it is like taking food off the table for the poor."

More on This Story

Related Stories

Wednesday, 8 May 2013

Nigeria: 'Many dead in Boko Haram raid' in Borno state



Policeman inspects site at Bama in Nigeria (May 7 2013)The attack was said to have lasted for five hours
Fifty-five people have been killed in the north-east of Nigeria in co-ordinated attacks by the Boko Haram militant group, the Nigerian army says.
It said 105 prisoners were freed in the pre-dawn raid in Bama, Borno state.
Bama's police station, military barracks and government buildings were burned to the ground, said the military and witnesses.
Correspondents say extremist attacks are common in the region but the scale of bloodshed makes this raid stand out.
This strike - coming on the back of other deadly attacks - undermines the suggestion that the military operation against the militants has diminished the threat they pose, says the BBC's Will Ross in Lagos.
Map
President Goodluck Jonathan has set up a committee to agree the terms of an amnesty for the rebels but Boko Haram's leader, Abubakar Shekau, has so far rejected the idea.
Tuesday's raid in the remote town began when some 200 heavily-armed suspected members of Boko Haram arrived in buses and pick-up trucks at about 05:00 (04:00 GMT), said Musa Sagir, a military spokesman based in Maiduguri, some 70km (44 miles) from Bama.
"Some of the gunmen attacked the military barracks but they were repelled. Ten of them were killed and two were arrested," he told AFP news agency.
"But the gunmen broke into the prison, freeing 105 inmates, and killed all prison warders they could see except those who hid in a store where cooking utensils were kept," he said.
Some of the attackers wore army uniforms for the assault, which continued for almost five hours, he added.

Analysis

In late 2012 you could have argued that the military operation against the Islamist militants had diminished the threat. But not any more.
Coming on the back of other deadly attacks, this is probably the most significant strike against the state apparatus since the Kano bombings in January 2012. The army says it was the work of Boko Haram. If that is true, by targeting the police, army and a prison with such devastating effect, the group appears to be sending out the defiant message that it cannot be defeated by the state security forces. There are reports that the militants have acquired more powerful weapons.
The suggestion that some politicians are fuelling the conflict or even backing the Islamist extremists is not fading.
The current military offensive is not working. So what is the way forward? President Goodluck Jonathan appears to have put his faith in God and the unlikely prospect of all the Islamist militants accepting an amnesty. His predecessors have faced daunting security challenges but this one is on a different scale.
Children
Twenty-two police officers, 14 prison wardens, two soldiers and four civilians are said to have died along with 13 members of Boko Haram.
Bama police commander Abubakar Sagir was quoted as saying the civilians comprised a woman and three children.
Police and public buildings - reportedly including a magistrate's court - were razed to the ground.
"The call to prayer was just being said at about 05:00 when the Boko Haram started shooting from all directions and we ran for our lives," a witness, Amina Usman, told Reuters.
"One woman who could not run burned to death," Ms Usman added.
Boko Haram, as it is popularly known, has its roots in this region of Nigeria. It is fighting to overthrow the government and set up an Islamic state.
Late last month the military launched a raid to hunt down militants in Baga, also in Borno state, after Boko Haram militants attacked a military patrol.
Nearly 200 people died in the raid, and thousands of buildings were destroyed, leading to claims by rights groups that the military had used excessive force. The army put the number killed at 37.

More on This Story

From other news sites

Friday, 3 May 2013

Fare disparity by foreign airlines: Why it persists



 0   
May 3, 2013 | 12:32 am
BY  LAWANI MIKAIRU
THE issue of fare disparity by foreign airline operating in Nigeria has once again come to the front burner as Nigerians who travelled recently on these foreign airlines complained bitterly about paying higher fares than their fellow passengers from Ghana, for instance, on the same flight.
Investigation by Vanguard revealed that as at April 19th, 2013, passengers travelling on First Class of British Airways from Abuja, Nigeria, to London, Heathrow Airport pay 9,548.25 US Dollars, while another passenger travelling from Ghana on the  same First Class, same plane to London Heathrow Airport will pay 4,970.55 US Dollars. Similarly, passenger on Business Class on the same British Airways from Abuja , Nigeria, to London Heathrow  pays 4,708.80, US Dollars while another passenger from Ghana on the same Business Class, will pay 2,920.55 US Dollars.
This fares disparity is practiced by other foreign airline like KLM-Air France, Lufthansa, Emirate Airline, amongst others. What could be responsible for these higher fares paid by passengers travelling from Nigeria ? Vanguard findings show that despite cry by Nigerians and Nigerian Aviation agencies this fare disparity persist because some of the causes are still there and not properly addressed. And most importantly, the issue has not be revisited since the last public sitting by Senate committee on Aviation.
It will be recalled that Nigeria Government, through the Aviation Ministry, had on March 25, 2012, issued the offending airlines a 30-day ultimatum to address this disparity or face been ban from operating in Nigeria. The ultimatum expired and after Senate Committee on Aviation public sitting on the issue, the airlines still stuck to the offensive fares.
While the storm on fare disparity raged, some of the affected foreign airlines were silent  on the issue. But the British Airways was quite vocal, saying its fares are determined by the forces of demand and supply.
British Airways Country manager for Nigeria, Mr Kolawole Olayinka, had said at the public sitting that it was unfortunate and sad that the issue of airfare disparity and profitability was being discussed. He told the senators that prices are determined by market forces of demand and supply and not by legislation.
He said: “But that aside, you did not actually tell us which laws were violated. I am a Nigerian and as a Nigerian, I will do everything possible where prices can come down, but we only need to do one thing. Prices are determined by the forces of demand and supply; let more airlines come in. Let more airlines fly into Nigeria many more times. Our skies are closed. Open up the skies and let more airlines come in.”
British Airways position on this issue has not changed. In a telephone interview, Mr Olayinka, told Vanguard that the disparity in fares between passengers going to London from Accra , Ghana and those travelling from Lagos to London is now minimal . He said since market forces determine the prices of goods and services, British Airways places the interest and satisfaction of its customers first. That is why its fares are competitive. He further said the operating environment must be taken into consideration when discussing fare disparity. Other factors like market size, demand for premium and economy tickets must also be considered.
Cameron, British PM. and President Jonathan
Cameron, British PM and President Jonathan
Mr Olayinka said “ It is market forces that determine prices. We are in a free market economy. Government do not and cannot fix fares. Our fares change with the seasons. You cannot expect airfares for summer, when there is rush by holiday makers, to be the same like during winter. These seasons determine prices. Our prices are competitive. Our concern is customer’s satisfaction. We try to give our customers best services and at the end of each flight, we want them to say: thank you “.
Last year, when the controversy was on and the Senate Committee on Aviation was sitting, Senate President, David Mark, had said the return of the nation’s national carrier would create employment opportunities for Nigerians as well as restore  some level of competition which will eventually reduce prices.
Ultimatum to foreign airlines
An Aviation Consultant, Mr Chris Aligbe also contributed to the debate when the Aviation Minister gave the foreign airlines ultimatum to address the fare disparity. He said  the  “ Minister was now speaking the minds of Nigeria-based passengers who were usually extorted whenever they flew in foreign airlines. With the ultimatum given by the minister, the Federal Government is taking the issue of disparity in fares paid by passengers from Nigeria seriously. The Federal Government is now showing concern about the plight of Nigerians and others who opt to fly with foreign airlines,”
Reacting also to the Minister’s 30-day ultimatum to foreign airlines to cut down fares or face ban, British Airways had  said it was wrong for the Nigerian government to have based its conclusion only on distance and geographical location in its assessment of fares charged in Nigeria and Ghana. Explaining the reasons for fare disparity between Nigeria and Ghana, the airline told the Senate aviation committee that : “Nigeria and Ghana differ substantially in terms of demand mix. The market in Ghana is smaller than Nigeria and has lower premium traffic as a proportion of total traffic.
“Premium passengers in Nigeria tend to book closer to the date of travel which results in higher fares, and once revenue management principles are applied, British Airways allocates a number of seats to each fare class and cheaper fares are available for bookings made in advance of the travel date but these will necessarily be limited to ensure that there are still seats available for purchase closer to the date of travel.
“ This will, therefore, have an impact on prices, as it would do in any high demand/capacity restricted market .The capacity stipulated under the ASA for Ghana, unlike for Nigeria, has not been reached and in any case, the government of Ghana has already shown a willingness to move towards an ‘open skies’ policy with no restrictions on frequencies in order for the economy of Ghana to benefit from the fast growing aviation market.
Open skies policy
“ An open skies policy will also attract other airlines to operate new services to Ghana, in the knowledge they will be able to increase services to match demand in the future, helping Accra to develop an aviation hub for West Africa.”
British Airways said also that it not true  that all of its fares on the Lagos/London and/or Abuja/London routes were higher than those on the Accra/London route, adding that it offers 40 different fares on Lagos- London route. The airline said  “Our fare offering on the Nigeria-London routes is extensive. In total, on the Lagos-London route, British Airways offers up to 40 different fares across all classes of travel at any one time, each with different conditions such as dates for travel, pre-booking periods and length of stay, which are designed to meet the needs of different passengers. In addition, we have many special offers throughout the year.
Stella Oduah, Aviation Minister
Stella Oduah, Aviation Minister
Cheapest economy fare
“ Our cheapest Lagos-London Club class fare is currently $3507 ($3147 ex Abuja) which compares to the cheapest Accra -London Club fare of $2956, a difference of only $551 ($191 for Abuja), of which $227 is made up of higher Nigerian tax compared to Ghana. So the relative fare from Abuja is actually cheaper than Accra, and only $324 more expensive from Lagos once additional Nigerian tax is taken into account.
“ The cheapest economy fare from Lagos to London is $1051 and $999 from Abuja compared to the cheapest economy fare of $1,164 from Accra to London. In short, many of our Lagos and Abuja economy fares are either cheaper or only marginally higher than fares from Accra despite the problems of constrained capacity out of Nigeria.
“ The main reason premium fares from Nigeria are higher than those comparable fares from Ghana is attributable to capacity restrictions, brought about by current frequency restrictions on air services under the terms of the UK/Nigeria Bilateral Air Services Agreement, BASA. Under the BASA, UK designated airlines are unable to operate more than 21 services per week between the UK and Nigeria. UK airlines have always operated the full number of services allowed under the bilateral ASA. On the other hand, Nigerian carriers, which are also permitted to operate up to 21 services per week between Nigeria and the UK have not taken up their permitted frequencies.
“ It should be noted in this context that in the period from 1999 to date, the frequency restriction has only been increased by four services per week for each side, which has not met the growth of passengers in the same period. As a consequence, there is excess demand for premium seats on British Airways, resulting in very high load factors and, inevitably higher prices as BA seeks to ration seats in order to ensure that seats are available for our Nigerian late-booking premium passengers.
MMA Lagos.
MMA Lagos.
Premium passengers
“As Premium capacity in particular is so constrained, if British Airways were to artificially suppress premium fares, important customer benefits, in the form of (1) late availability of seats; and (2) fully flexible tickets, would effectively be removed from the market and passengers would be unable to travel in their cabin of choice or make changes as may be required by their business needs.
“ By contrast, pursuant to the terms of the UK/Ghana Air Services Agreement, there is still available capacity and frequencies in order to grow services further to meet market demand.
“British Airways is thus able to offer lower premium fares to stimulate the premium market, in full knowledge that we will nearly always be able to offer  late-available premium seats for sale. This is not the case in the constrained Nigerian market.
“All passengers travelling from Nigeria to the UK have a choice of both direct and indirect services. Passengers wishing to travel on direct services between Lagos and London have a choice of three airlines, namely British Airways, Arik Air and Virgin Atlantic.
“Passengers have further choice of indirect services with many European carriers such as Air France, KLM and Lufthansa, as well as other African and Middle Eastern airlines. British Airways competes fairly with all these carriers, and in choosing to book British Airways as opposed to the other available carriers, Nigerian passengers have concluded that British Airways represents at that time the most competitive and/or suitable option for their journey.
Olayinka, who represented the airline, said passengers have a free choice “Similarly, passengers have a free choice as to whether they pay more to travel in our premium cabins rather than in our economy cabin.
Competitive industry
Each premium cabin offers an increased level of enhanced service which British Airways prices accordingly.
“We emphase that it is the passenger who must have the choice of which airline he or she travels on and at which level of service he or she wishes to pay for, which can only be achieved by a competitive industry. Rather than artificially suppressing fares, which have already been set according to a fair and competitive market in a deregulated environment like Nigeria, the Aviation Committee will do Nigerian aviation a world of good by ensuring the fast-growing market in Nigeria is better served by sufficient capacity to meet demand by greatly increasing permitted frequencies under the terms of the BASA.
“This would be the best way to ensure that fares remain competitive, that Nigerian passengers’ demand  for seats are met and that the Nigerian economy is not disadvantaged by lack of aviation connectivity with the rest of the world.”
It was also revealed during the sitting that the UK government had been asking for increased capacity for its carriers operating in Nigeria, adding that the Federal Government was yet to respond to the demand. The airline said it had operated air services between Nigeria and the UK in full conformity with the BASA between both countries.
It said: “As mutually agreed by the UK and the Nigerian governments at bilateral talks in November 2011, the UK CAA is already undertaking an independent study of fares between the UK and Nigeria, and both governments agreed to await the outcome of that study in mid 2012. This is the correct procedure to follow under international law, which pertains to the BASA as it is an international treaty between the UK and Nigeria. British Airways remains committed to Nigeria and continues to serve the country and its people with daily flights to Lagos and Abuja.
“The comfort of our customers is of utmost importance to us, they are the very reason we remain in business, we are proud and delighted that we are able to offer a choice of different competitive fares, a choice of products and connections to our Nigerian customers.”
The British government has also reacted to the controversy. British High Commission spokesman said any ban on  British carriers would erode the bilateral relations between Nigeria and Britain. This was followed by a declaration by the Deputy High Commissioner, Giles Lever, that the federal government has no  rights to ban foreign airlines, arguing that the airlines were private enterprises, whose operations were determined by market forces.
“It is not correct to state that all of BA’s fares on the Lagos/London and/or Abuja/London routes are higher than those on the Accra/London route.
In reaching this conclusion it appears that the highest premium fares from Lagos have been directly compared to the lowest premium fares from Accra. Furthermore, no analysis has been given to economy fares, which account for by far the larger portion of our sales in Nigeria.”
The airline said: “British Airways is fully legally compliant with the requirements of the Air Services Agreement between the UK and Nigeria.
Commercial dispute
We remain committed to Nigeria and continue to serve the country with daily flights to Lagos and Abuja. We have been flying there for more than 75 years and pride ourselves on offering competitive fares, a choice of products and connections to our Nigerian customers. All of our fares are set on a sound commercial basis and remain fully competitive with other carriers in the region including Arik Air.”
The advise of the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Olugbenga Ashiru might suffice at this point. He told the committee that they should not allow what he described as commercial dispute degenerate into diplomatic row.
He said: “It should be a commercial discussion and not dispute. What we have is a commercial dispute and what we see happening now is a failure of regulatory agencies to do their jobs. If the regulatory agencies had done their job very well, we would not have got to this stage. There is no justification for the rip off that Nigerians are going through.”
Although  Minister of Aviation, Stella Oduah, in her remarks also described the disparity as exploitative and bad  after the public sitting, nothing has been heard again about fare disparity. She had said then : “Nigeria supports profitable operations when the profits are reasonable but rejects exploitation and unreasonable excessive profiteering by exploiting her people. We are still on this issue and your voice from the Senate is welcome.”