Saturday, 4 October 2014

Boko Haram insurgency tearing Nigerian families apart

BBC

Boko Haram survivor: "Right in front of me they burnt my mother alive"
At a camp for displaced people in the north-eastern Nigerian city of Yola, survivors of the recent attacks in the north of Adamawa state are scarred by what they have witnessed.
This war is tearing families apart.
"When Boko Haram attacked [the town of] Madagali they rounded us up and then shot my father," says Rejoice, 19, a student.
"Then right in front of me they burnt my mother alive."
Rejoice was freed and subsequently spent weeks on the run, hiding in the bush and crossing rivers.
Traumatised teenager
Along with others from Madagali they survived by digging up yams from hastily abandoned farms.
Displaced child with Nigeria shirtDisplaced people range from the young...
Displaced 80-year-old Fati Goni Bukar ... to the old, such as this 80-year-old woman
"I could hardly eat because of what I saw and even now in the camp I don't feel like eating food," the traumatised teenager says. She is now alone with no relatives.
There are many children who have lost contact with their parents, as well as mothers and fathers who have no idea what has happened to their sons and daughters among more than 4,500 displaced people here.
Desperate for news
"There was panic in Michika as people heard that Boko Haram were coming," says Sauki, recalling the day in early September when the jihadists captured another town near the Cameroonian border.
The leader of the Nigerian Islamist extremist group Boko Haram, Abubakar ShekauBoko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau has announced a caliphate in areas that the militants control
An officer of the Joint Military Task Force (JTF) stands beside sand bags at a road block in the north-eastern Nigerian city of Maiduguri on 30 April 2013Government troops are battling to defeat the well-armed insurgents
"We all ran but my mother did not want to leave."
Her eyes welling up with tears, Sauki is desperate for news of what happened to her.
"I met a woman who told me she saw my mother when they were hiding in the fields and my mother begged her for some food which they shared.
"But I don't know where she is now. I've no way of reaching my mother - she doesn't have a phone," Sauki tells me.
There is a dire need for help with tracing relatives but with so many areas too dangerous to reach as the war rages on, Sauki and other shattered families can get little help for now.
"I want to believe that where their parents are hiding now is very difficult terrain," says Haruna Hamman Furo of Adamawa State's Emergency Management Agency.
"They are on top of mountains and some have crossed over into neighbouring countries of Cameroon and Chad so communication is very difficult."
Camp for displaced people in Adamawa state, north-eastern NigeriaMany of the displaced have been uprooted several times
Camp for displaced people in Adamawa state, north-eastern NigeriaThe short-term chances of displaced people being able to return to their homes are slim
Mr Furo says that the task may be easier "at the end of the day when things settle down".
For several years people have been running from the brutal Boko Haram attacks and then - when possible - returning home as soon as they feel it is safe.
But the situation has now changed. The jihadists are holding territory so entire communities have run away and have no idea when they can return - hence the need for these camps in cities like Maiduguri and Yola.
Many of those fleeing have been uprooted over and over again. Amos Amthe says that Boko Haram members overran Gwoza town in August, moving into his home and forcing his family to run from the guns three more times. Sometimes they fled with the soldiers.
Captured military hardware
"I saw a group of soldiers running out of Michika, some on motorbikes and other vehicles," he says.
Girl arrives at a camp for displaced people in Adamawa State (October 2014)There are regular new arrivals to camps for displaced people
"I asked one of them what was happening and he told me it was tough at the other side so I said: "Soldier do I have to relocate?" He said I'd better so I had no other choice than to follow."
A video shot by Boko Haram as they captured Gwoza shows the size of the arsenal at their disposal.
Among the military hardware captured from the army are armoured personnel carriers and even a tank.
A cameraman zooms in on what appear to be several Nigerian soldiers being shot at as they run into the rocky hills that surround the town.
The insurgents can then be seen looting the armoury by torchlight at night.
There have been many instances of soldiers complaining that they have not had the resources to take on Boko Haram fighters but the government says that is being fixed.
Psychological support
"The equipment to help them is on its way and some of it has come - that is what has helped them to make their advances," says Finance Minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala.
The military has recently prevented Boko Haram from capturing Konduga, near Maiduguri, and there are reports of heavy losses amongst the jihadist fighters.
The finance minister visited the camp this week, promising more help for the displaced, especially the children.
map
"We have to solve this problem. Recently our army has been scoring some successes so we need to push on on that front but while that is being dealt with, we can't just wait - we have to act with all these children here," she told the BBC.
Some very basic classes have just started. It is better than nothing and more resources have been promised, including volunteer teachers, counsellors and computers from Yola's American University of Nigeria.
The local emergency authorities say children have been getting some much-needed psychological support.
"There are nasty stories and you shed tears. I remember vividly the first day the children came here, they saw an aeroplane flying and they were running for their dear lives saying: 'Look they are coming to shell us'," recalls Mr Furo from the state emergency authority.
Children growing up in the north-east have been force-fed a diet of violence. Right now in the areas controlled by Boko Haram that continues.
In the latest video released by the jihadists, a man is shown buried up to his neck. He is then seemingly stoned to death for adultery. Many children are among the large crowd watching on.
As the war rages on, the impact on these children will be felt for years.

Friday, 3 October 2014

BOKO HARAM AND ITS SPONSORS


Prof. Femi Ajayi
here have been allegations and counter allegations against some prominent Nigerians, and non-Nigerians, as sponsors of Boko Haram; possibly due to their body languages, of which some of them have denied the allegations. The Federal Government sometimes claimed that there are Boko Haram sympathisers within its administration.
In addition, it has been reported that hundreds of people accused of links with Boko Haram have been arbitrarily detained without charge or trial; others have been extra-judicially executed or subjected to enforced disappearance. The efforts towards this end are essential to fish out those sponsoring the sect.
Regrettably, Boko Haram has moved from petrifying Nigerians, and resolved into abductions, using female suicide bombers, believed to be Chibok girls; hosting its flags in its captured territories, to the declaration of Gwoza Caliphate. It is unlike Nigerian that a female would volunteer to be a suicide bomber.
Ironically, Jonathan is being measured by the abduction of over 300 children from Borno State as a way of assessing his administration. The former Nigerian leaders, that bastardized the system, refused to establish strong governance machineries for the future administrators. It is unfortunate that Jonathan has to bear the brunt of mismanagement of the preceding window dressing Nigerian leaders. They are now enjoying their loots, pleased with their despicable scripted governance the country is witnessing today (September 2014).
Regardless of Boko Haram tactics in getting influential individuals to fund its activities, through threats or use of force, should not deter the Federal Government from investigating the alleged sponsors.
In any given national security apparatus, it runs on combination of management practices and technical capabilities. It is obvious that the operations of Nigeria security forces, grossly lack intelligence gathering as well as in the use of modern techniques and equipment in tracking down criminals and insurgents. There is the need to have a clear understanding of the technical issues underlying national security in order to create and sustain the national security institutions that may ultimately affect the future of a nation state. Nonetheless, it is essential for the government to focus more on the sponsors of Boko Haram; while Nigerians deserve a peaceful environment to live their life.
The Spiritual Leader of One Love Family, Sat Guru Maharaj Ji, claimed that he had revealed the sponsors of the sect to President Goodluck Jonathan that some former military rulers, a former Vice President, and some leaders in the North are financiers of the insurgents. He went further to state that "… they said after the 2011 general elections that because power did not return to the North, they would make the nation ungovernable."
The United Alliance, in a statement by its northern co-ordinator, Bashir Ado, said the abduction of the school girls was part of the agenda of the northern elders to mortify President Goodluck Jonathan. In his words, "The disappearance of the girls is part of the Northern elders' agenda to embarrass and distract the Goodluck Jonathan government. They deliberately took the girls away to create an impression of insecurity and paint the picture that nobody is safe in the country, whereas they are the architect of these self- inflicting wounds aimed at distracting the government."
Should these statements intimidate the government in providing adequate securities for its citizens?
A 63-year-old Australian expert, Dr. Stephen Davis, who acted as a negotiator, not only in the Chibok issue, but also as an adviser for Chief Olusegun Obasanjo and late Shehu Yar'Adua, made some not too clandestine disclosure, the sponsors of Boko Haram. In his revelation, he mentioned some prominent Nigerians as sponsors of Boko Haram. Davis spent four intense months in the North-East and his life was subject to extreme danger while he tried to rescue more than 200 Chibok girls kidnapped by Boko Haram.
Another Secret Intelligence Report links ex-Governor Sheriff, Chad President to Boko Haram sponsorship

Ali Modu Sheriff sat in high level security and his Chadian Australian negotiator, Dr. S. Davis, and BH commanders in 2013
Colleague, Idris Derby State House Photo
Various reports circulating in the Nigeria media are alleging that Boko Haram imitates Islamic State in Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon. The similarities became even more evident after Boko Haram leader, Abubakar Shekau, declared Islamic Caliphate in Gwoza in the video released Sunday, August 24, 2014.
The more advanced weaponry of Boko Haram, better than Nigerian Army, is not an excuse for Nigerian Army to retreat from facing the insurgents. Nonetheless, most Nigerians are concerned about how the group got the sophisticated weapons, armoured vehicles, which are not manufactured locally without any foreign or local funding.
Citizens are very much concerned about the prolonged Government efforts in bringing Boko Haram activities under control. The government has failed to marshal diplomacy to rally allies across the world and isolate threats, maintain effective armed forces to overpower the insurgents. It also lacks some strong anti-terrorism legislation, and the use of intelligence services to detect and defeat or avoid threats from Boko Haram. Unfortunately it has not applied counterintelligence services to protect the citizens from Boko Haram and get hold of its sponsors.
Though violence and crimes exist, and perhaps, are inevitable in every human society, however when these have reached a worrisome level, a very proactive solution is required. Nigerian government must know that voting huge budget for national security, when most Nigerians find it extremely difficult to live a decent life, is like running a race that has no end. The first proactive step Nigerian government should take is to secure its environment for its citizens while aggressively pursuing its sponsors.
Is the Nigerian Military fully committed to the course of dismantling Boko Haram, despite the huge Security Budget?
It is generally assumed that Boko Haram fighters are indeed better equipped than the Nigerian Army. At least some Boko Haram fighters believe in their "cause"; the achievement of justice, for the poor, through Sharia. Ironically, the theoretical aspect of introducing Sharia went unchallenged, while its enforcement has led to the Boko Haram Islamic Caliphate. Tactfully Boko Haram never leaves behind its dead, or its weapons; stages high-profile jailbreaks to free its captive operatives, and provides payments for widows and children of its fighters who are regularly paid. The big question is what is the federal Government doing about its sponsors?
A school of thought suggests that government forces simply run away when Boko Haram forces approach. Its psychological warfare is well placed, with its long tradition of killing any person in the security services. We could deduct that Boko Haram strength is most likely apply to the most ideologically or religiously committed of Islamist fighters, not to the criminal or other score-settling elements, or the political factions that are likely part of the general insurgency.
While it is interesting to note that some mysterious snakes and bees in the Sambisa Forest, which they unscientifically believed was spiritual attacks, that had killed many of their leaders, forced the fleeing of Boko Haram members to seek for an abode in Gwoza, its Islamic Caliphate.
It is an embarrassment on the part of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, on its little or no preparations to shield Gwoza town from Boko Haram; despite its earlier warnings of occupying the City, from its hideout in Gwoza Hills. The City that gave me the experience of Mountain climbing, along with my Geography students, while serving NYSC at Government Secondary School, Bama. With the group then, was the former Borno State Governor, Modu Sheriff, who was an active Geography Students and as one of the School officials.
Most Nigerians, through the media, public gatherings have expressed their dissatisfaction over the millipede approach of the Federal Government in extinguishing the insurgents. Nobel Laureate, Professor Wole Soyinka, expressed his amazement that the Nigerian President, with the available security reports at its disposal, has failed to prosecute the sponsors and members of Boko Haram. Soyinka believes that Boko Haram sponsorship allegation against a former Governor of Borno State, Ali Modu Sheriff, by an Australian negotiator, Stephen Davis, must be pursued.
While Femi Falana (SAN), is of the opinion that the Nigeria Security agencies have enough evidence to prosecute Senator Ali Modu Sheriff, the Borno State ex-governor.
The prosecution of Ali Modu Sheriff would bring more bombshells in revealing other sponsors of the heavily equipped Boko Haram. On the other hand, prominent northerners and politicians might have to explain to DSS their relationships with Boko Haram.
Nonetheless, this is not the period for any group, or an individual, to exonerate individuals until the full investigation has been conducted. Insecurity in Nigeria is not a political chess game, for any political party to claim innocence, as sponsors cut across various segments of the country.
The APC statement that, "Don't Touch Sanusi", "Hand over Sheriff, Ihejirika to ICC", is uncivilized on this super sensitive security situation in Nigeria. Sheriff was reported to have resolved into physical confrontation with Tinubu at one of their meetings before calling it quit with APC. That does not justify APC political unpatriotic indictment of Sheriff; and sparing Sanusi.
Definitely, the Government has to go after the insurgents' sponsors for peace to return to that part of Nigeria, most especially, and to the country at large.
The Senate President reminded his colleagues that, "… the nation is at war…a challenge even to our legitimacy in this chamber because if they have gone far by saying that they have declared a caliphate, then any senator or member who is from there, is no more entitled to be in this chamber."
It is a known fact that some Nigerian politicians sponsor the insurgents and receive 'cross-border' backing from supporters in neighboring Cameroon, Niger, and Chad.
The purported killing of Boko Haram leader, Abubakar Shekau, should not deceive Nigerians and make the President to myopically prophecy that the menace of the dreaded terrorist Boko Haram, as a joke of the century, would end in October 2014. Osama Bin Laden died several times before he was actually committed to the mother earth.

Pictures released by military authorities in Nigeria Wednesday showing the dead leader of Boko Haram, Abubakar
Shekau and when he was alive.
Terrorism, as a global phenomenon, has escalated to a point of no instantaneous conclusion, regardless Jonathan magic wand. Boko Haram has declared total war of secession against Nigeria. In effect, the government must, as a matter of urgency, go after its sponsors; as feeding, the enemies would mean more strength and empowerment to the insurgents.
In curtailing the menace of Boko Haram the government ought to marshal diplomacy to rally allies across the world and isolate threats, maintain effective armed forces to overpower the insurgents. In addition some strong anti-terrorism legislation, which the Lawmakers have REFUSED to enact, is needed. This is in addition to the use intelligence services to detect and defeat, or avoid threats from Boko Haram. Using or applying counterintelligence services to protect the citizens, prosecute the sponsors, and starve Boko Haram of resources, should be applied.
The time is ripe for the Nigerian Government to act and show what makes it a Nation, as the Boko Haram has seized some towns and established a base. Regardless the use of intimidation in getting influential individuals to fund its activities, Nigeria government should prosecute the alleged sponsors.
Chopping off the Snake head half-way could be more dangerous than cutting-off its head completely. The government option is to focus more on the sponsors of Boko Haram and prosecute them with the full length of the law, in all fronts; economically, physically, psychologically and resolves the replacement of Kanem-Bornu Empire with Boko Haram Islamic Caliphate. It seems that the sustenance of the insurgents would be crossing the established period of gesticulation in enshrining the sect, if the government fails and refuses to act soonest in crushing the group in its entirely.
Since it has been established the possibility of Jonathan vying for 2015 President, under PDP, will the grand design of the rebellious PDP members with five Governors; considered a desperate fight for power shift from South to North; in addition to the renewal of most oil well licenses belonging to some Northerners; believed to expire 2015, materialize? Time will tell if and when Boko Haram ends it terror campaign when a Northern won the 2015 Presidential election; a window to the direction of the status of Nigeria economy after the 2015 elections, largely based on Oil revenue. Food for thought for Nigerians!
So Help Us God!
Amen!!!

Thursday, 2 October 2014

Does job success depend on data rather than your CV?

BBC

people waiting for a job interview (stock image)
The bald truth is that most companies are pretty bad at recruitment.
Nearly half of new recruits turn out to be duds within 18 months,according to one study, while two-thirds of hiring managers admit they've often chosen the wrong people.
And the main reason for failure is not because applicants didn't have the requisite skills, but because their personalities clashed with the company's culture.
So these days employers are resorting to big data analytics and other new methods to help make the fraught process of hiring and firing more scientific and effective.
For job hunters, this means success is now as much to do with your online data trail as your finely crafted CV.
Game for a job?
While the internet has certainly made it easier to match jobseekers with vacancies, a number of firms are moving beyond automatic keyword matching to find "suitable" candidates and trying more sophisticated analyses instead.
For example, recruitment technology firm Electronic Insight doesn't even bother to look at your skills and experience when analysing CVs on behalf of clients.
Knack games as advertised on the iTunes store Recruiters claim that games reveal more about a candidate than a traditional CV and covering letter
"We just look at what people write and how they structure their sentences," says Marc Mapes, the firm's chief innovation officer.
Its algorithm analyses language patterns to reveal a candidate's personality and attitude, and then compares this against the cultural profile of the company.
"About 84% of people who get fired do so because of lack of cultural fit, not because of lack of skills," he maintains.
And companies such as Silicon Valley start-up Knack are even developing games as a way of assessing the suitability of job candidates.
While applicants play an online game designed to reveal their personality, emotional maturity and problem-solving skills, hundreds of pieces of information are being collected in the background and analysed by data scientists.
For example, one game, Wasabi Waiter, involves the player serving customers in a restaurant and assessing their moods and desires. Every decision and choice the player makes tells a story, often unconsciously. Play reveals our true personality, the company argues.
"Gamification is definitely coming in," says Paul Finch, managing director of Konetic, an online recruitment technology company. "Games can tell if you're a risk taker or innovator and they appeal to youngsters' gaming culture."
Size matters
But innovative personality tests are supplements to, not replacements for, big data analytics, many recruiters believe.
Analysis of historic data from tens of millions of job applicants, successful or otherwise, is helping employers predict which new candidates are likely to be the best based on a comparison with the career paths, personalities and qualifications of previously successful employees.
"Now we're able to use our own data to track how long candidates stay in a role before seeking new opportunities," says Geoff Smith, managing director of recruitment consultancy Experis.
power of big data series branding
Can big data really revolutionise our world? We explore how the explosion of information and analysis will impact our lives and our privacy.
"We can also map out and predict typical career paths based on other candidates' career histories, which makes us more efficient and more able to help candidates with their future career ambitions," he says.
Ben Hutt, chief executive of Talent Party, a UK and Australian job site aiming to become "the Google of job search", agrees that data science is saving recruiters a lot of time and money.
"We have 10 million candidate CVs on our database," he says. "Using automated semantic analysis we can match suitable candidates to relevant jobs quickly and efficiently, saving human resources managers a lot of time."
And Juan Urdiales, co-founder of recruitment website Jobandtalent, says machine learning algorithms are making the process of matching suitable candidates to relevant jobs much more accurate.
"We analyse more than 2.5 million profiles and more than 2.5 million job offers every month and learn which jobs the applicants click on and which they reject, refining the search process based on that data," he says.
Selection bias
All this data analytics is also challenging perceptions about what skills and experiences candidates should have for the post.
President Obama speaking at The White House President Obama's White House has endorsed Evolv's software as a way of fighting recruitment prejudices
For example, San Francisco-based company Evolv found that long-term unemployed people perform no worse than those who have had more regular work.
It also found that prior work experience and even education are not necessarily indicators of good performance in some roles.
And for some reason, service industry workers who regularly use five social media platforms or more per week tend to be more productive but less loyal than their less digitally social colleagues.

Start Quote

It's all about reputation. If people can't manage their own reputations, how are they going to protect the reputations of their future employers?”
Paul FinchKonetic
Social profile
In addition to all the historic data analysts have at their disposal, social media is offering recruiters a rich new vein of real-time data.
Our blogs, websites, Twitter rants and LinkedIn profiles reveal as much - if not more - about us than a semi-fictionalised CV.
"The days of keeping your personal and professional profiles separate are over," warns Experis's Geoff Smith.
"Social media is a great platform for individuals to demonstrate their expertise, experience and enthusiasm for their field of specialism. However, candidates need to be conscious of the online reputation they are building and the data trail they are leaving behind."
A growing number of tech companies are offering tools that can sift through masses of social media data and spot patterns of behaviour and sentiment.
Facebook logo reflected in eyeballEmployers are watching: what does your social media profile say about you?
"Online tools, such as Sprout Social and Hootsuite enable our recruiters to keep an ear to the ground on what's going on with their clients, candidates and in the sectors we're working in," says Mr Smith.
Konetic's Paul Finch agrees that applicants need to be aware what image their online profiles project.
"It's all about reputation. If people can't manage their own reputations, how are they going to protect the reputations of their future employers?" he asks.
Human touch
But technology can only take us so far, argues Jerry Collier, director of global innovation at Alexander Mann Solutions, a company sourcing staff for blue-chip companies including HSBC, Rolls-Royce and Vodafone.
"Recruiting should be about relationships," he says. "Technology is only there to make that process simpler and more efficient.
"If you want diversity and a richer, more creative workplace, you need people from different backgrounds and experiences.
"Leave that to an algorithm and it will probably come up with the same type of person every time."
Talent Party's Ben Hutt agrees, saying: "When you apply data science to 10 million CVs, it becomes something really useful.
"But data science is never going to replace the face-to-face interview."

Could the US start sending its oil overseas?

BBC


Two men operate an oil rig in Illinois.
Americans enjoy some of the cheapest petrol prices in the world, due in large part to relatively low federal taxes on fuel and a four-decade-old ban on the export of crude petroleum.
But a US oil drilling boom has some people calling for the ban to be lifted so that US oil can flow onto the world market.
First time visitors to the United States are often shocked to see just how cheap petrol is in the US. While prices vary by region and state-by-state, the cost for a litre of petrol in Washington, DC, is about $0.93 (£0.57 ). Compare that to $2.07 in London, $2.11 in Paris, $2.15 in Hong Kong, $1.53 in Tokyo and $1.39 in Rio de Janeiro, according to the research and consulting firm AIRINC.
All of this makes cross-country road trips in the US quite a bargain, relatively speaking.

Start Quote

Surging US production has created thousands of jobs, helped stabilise global oil markets and curbed our import dependence”
Robert J SamuelsonThe Washington Post
The current policy dates back to the Arab oil embargo of 1973-1974, when Opec countries reduced production to punish the US for giving aid to Israel during the Yom Kippur War. In order to protect itself from future volatility, the US instituted the export ban (exceptions were made for oil from Alaska and parts of California).
The ban's opponents say that leaving it in place could stifle future growth in the booming US oil industry by driving up domestic supply, lowering costs.
Jake Dweck, a Washington-based lawyer who is campaigning against the ban, told NPR that "the results would be reduced production, possibly shutting productions over time and reduced economic activity for the US economy as a whole".
Lifting the ban would allow US producers to sell their crude oil on global markets, providing a greater incentive to develop new technologies, seek out new sources of petroleum and boost the economy.
"The benefits are huge," writes Robert J Samuelson in the Washington Post. "Surging US production has created thousands of jobs, helped stabilise global oil markets and curbed our import dependence."
Ironically, much of the support for the present policy comes from oil refiners in the United States who are not covered by the ban. If it is lifted, they would be exposed to competition from cheaper overseas refining firms.
Environmentalists are also voicing long-running worries about the health and climate-change effects of the increased drilling a change could prompt.
"Only 20% to 25% percent of global proven oil reserves can be consumed between now and 2050 if we are to have an 80% chance of avoiding devastating climatic changes that would destroy the global economy,"writes Oilchange International's Lorne Stockman in an October 2013 report. "Therefore, allowing US crude oil exports specifically to enable exploitation of oil that is currently not included in those reserves is a recipe for disaster. We are in a hole, and we need to stop digging."
Public-safety issues are also a concern. Trains, often used to transport oil, have shown a penchant for wrecking and blowing up in recent years.

Start Quote

Favouring environmental concerns by maintaining the crude oil export ban would likely keep oil prices low in the United States, at least for now”
Timothy NoahMSNBC
Some skeptics warn that the impact that lifting the ban will have on US petrol prices is overestimated. Although it may be less expensive to refine oil abroad, the ban could raise the price of unrefined crude oil domestically.
"Traditionally, US crude sells for several dollars per barrel cheaper than does oil on the world market," Politico's Elana Schor writes. "Opponents fear that allowing exports would make the domestic oil price rise, triggering a similar spike for gasoline at the pump."
Timothy Noah writes on MSNBC.com that all this makes lifting the ban right now an unnecessary risk.
"Policymakers often have to choose between addressing climate change and acting to lower the price of oil," he says. "In this instance, though, favouring environmental concerns by maintaining the crude oil export ban would likely keep oil prices low in the United States, at least for now."
The debate seems to be graduating from oil industry squabbling to the broader political arena and is gaining political traction as November's mid-term congressional elections approach. Republicans, who could win a majority in the Senate and thus control both houses of Congress, are split on the issue.
While they are the party that traditionally champions free markets and increased drilling, Republicans may fear that the blame for any spikes in oil prices could be laid at their feet.
Democrats aren't united on the issue, either. Hoping to squeak by with just enough seats to maintain their majority in the Senate, Democrats are loath to alienate their environmentalist supporters.
Some prominent liberals have come out in favour of ending the ban, however.
"I believe that the question of whether the United States should have a substantially more permissive policy with respect to the export of crude oil and with respect to the export of natural gas is easy," President Barack Obama's former chief economic aide, Larry Summers said at a Brookings Institution event. "There is no environmental argument for a policy that distinguishes between oil produced in the United States for domestic consumption and oil produced in the United States for foreign consumption."
While prices at American pumps are relatively low, a price spike can quickly become a highly contentious political issue - as was the case prior to the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections.
Despite recent turmoil in oil-producing regions around the world, Americans have enjoyed relatively stable prices at the filling stations.
Members of Congress, currently on recess to campaign in their home districts, probably aren't hearing much from their constituents on the issue right now. One wrong step, however, and that would certainly change.