Thursday, 26 June 2014

Does Nigeria have an image problem?

BBC

Lagos carnival participants - Nigeria, 2012

Related Stories

Some years ago, a British filmmaker discovered an exotic site in Nigeria: An entire community of human beings subsisting on mountains of refuse.
And not in some remote state, but in Lagos, the country's commercial nerve centre - a city of fast cars, luxury shops and sleek folk, with women in Brazilian hair weaves and men in Ferragamo shoes.
Shortly after the Welcome to Lagos series aired on the BBC in April 2010, Nigerians around the world went berserk.
"There was this colonialist idea of the noble savage which motivated the programme," Nobel laureate Wole Soyinka said of the documentary.
"It was patronising and condescending," he added.

Start Quote

Adaobi Tricia Nwaubani
The Nigerian just has to kick up a tornado whenever he is perceived unpalatably”
Adaobi Tricia Nwaubani
Nigeria's High Commissioner to the UK Dalhatu Tafida described it as "a calculated attempt to bring Nigeria and its hard-working people to international odium and scorn".
Online forums also went ablaze. "They are giving us a bad image," many Nigerians fumed.
Then the Lagos State government submitted a formal complaint to the BBC, calling on the organisation to commission an alternative series to "repair the damage we believe this series has caused to our image".
These patriots were not distressed that their compatriots in the oil giant of Africa were living in such squalor - that development had somehow eluded those Nigerians.
They did not rally with cries of: "There are people in our country living like this? What shall we do? How fast can we act?"
No, no, no.
The majority of voices were harmonised in one tune: Anxiety over their country's image.
line
Nigeria in a word
  • BBC Africa asked people to describe Nigeria in one word using the hashtag #onewordnigeria. This is a word cloud of the responses:
Graphic word cloud showing short descriptions of Nigeria
line
Similarly, Nigeria was reluctant to accept desperately needed foreign assistance to fight terrorism, despite the country's armed forces being clearly overwhelmed.
We were more worried about how requesting help might affect Nigeria's image than about forestalling the wanton destruction by the Islamist militant group Boko Haram.
In October 1960, Nigeria was loosed from the shackles of imperialism when the colonialists packed their bags and left.
Africa Debate banner
Tune in to the BBC World Service at 1200 GMT on Friday 27 June to listen to The Africa Debate: Is Nigeria ready to lead Africa? It will also be rebroadcast that day in Africa at 1900 GMT.
To take part on Twitter - use the hashtag #BBCAfricaDebate - Facebook or Google+
But over five decades later, Nigerians remain in captivity: Foreigners control our self-image.
What the West thinks of us often takes manic precedence over who we really are, what we know and feel about ourselves.
The Europeans who first landed in Africa were unconcerned when the people they regarded as monkeys equally assumed that the white interlopers were ghosts.
The Germans can shrug it off when they are stereotyped as humourless; the Russians can dismiss it when they are described as cold.
But the Nigerian just has to kick up a tornado whenever he is perceived unpalatably.
He is touchy because he has no alternative image on which to base his confidence.
Like many Africans in the diaspora, a number of Nigerians abroad have erected careers out of defending their people's image.
With indignant frowns and stern tones, they strut from one global stage to the other like superintendents, dismantling stereotypes and whitewashing sepulchres.
A woman having her hair done at a hair salon in Lagos Island, Lagos, Nigeria - April 2014Lagos is home to a burgeoning middle class....
Children playing in the Makoko slum in Lagos, Nigeria (Archive shot)It also has many poor suburbs to accommodate the rapidly expanding population of the city
This passion probably sprouts from a desire to blend into their host communities, to not be perceived as savages from some nihilistic jungle.
Unknowingly, they reinforce the subconscious message that has been passed down to generations of Nigerians and other Africans: That the West's opinion of us is paramount; that enlightening and convincing foreigners matters more than discerning who we are and who we want to be.
Fret and panic
And so, when the West claps for us, we get excited.
When they tell us off, we get upset.
When they applaud one of us, we automatically join in applauding the person.
We frantically monitor foreign opinions and we panic at the slightest hint of a negative perception of us.
Nigerian reading newspaper headlines in Delta State - April 2011Nigerians are anxious about how they are portrayed in the international media
We fret about the many uncomplimentary stories from our land making the rounds on international media circuits, more than about the actual negative circumstances that birth those narratives.
From politicians to intellectuals to entertainers to terrorists, Nigerians have been socialised to rate themselves in the light of Western perceptions.
And as some of us have discovered first hand, the most effective way to draw the attention of our own people to any issue, is to speak to them through a Western medium.
It is unhealthy for a people's self-image to be hinged almost entirely on outside forces.
Nigeria expends too much valuable energy on sweeping dirt under carpets and stuffing skeletons inside closets.
Consequently, we deny ourselves the opportunity of frank dialogue, cultural criticism and self-examination—processes that are vital for a society to advance, by which the imperious West itself has developed thus far.
Nigeria can lead the rest of Africa in freeing our people from this image bondage.
line
Adaobi Tricia Nwaubani is a writer and the author of I Do Not Come to You by Chance.
line
The Africa Debate - Is Nigeria ready to lead Africa?- will be broadcast on the BBC World Service at 12:00 GMT on Friday 27 June and again at 19:00 GMT in Africa - and will be available to listen to online or as adownload.

More on This Story

Related Stories

Ekiti election: Deconstructing the Fayemi meltdown

Vanguard News - Latest updates from Nigeria, including business, politics, entertainment, fashion, health, technology, naija lifestyle
By  Is’haq Modibbo Kawu
AN honest disclosure is the appropriate way to start today’s piece. Kayode Fayemi, the outgoing governor of Ekiti State, is my friend.
Not only that though; on this page a few weeks ago, I wrote an endorsement of his re-election in last weekend’s gubernatorial election.
My endorsement was based on what I saw of his achievements in power over the past four years, as well as my knowledge of his commitment to the development of his community; his passion for our country and his intellectual and human decencies. Fayemi is the quintessential activist who made the transition into the world of politics with the unique opportunity to make a difference.
Naturally, for his friends and comrades, we hoped that in a small corner of Nigeria, one of our own could plant the mustard seed of development to vindicate the alternative vision of national development we have espoused over decades, often from the barricades of struggles against dictatorship and underdevelopment.
With the complete routing that our friend suffered last weekend, it was obvious that he did not properly understand the cloak-and-dagger propensities of Nigerian politics, especially as they manifested in his state. Many have been so shell-shocked about the Ekiti gubernatorial outcome, that those who should have commented, have been unable to rouse themselves from their shock.
But politics never allows for self-pity. Our duty is to carry out a dispassionate post-mortem, in order to draw lessons for the future. Lenin used to say that the occurrence of great historical events breaks some people and teaches others.
We must confront Kayode Fayemi’s political annihilation, learn its lessons, while underlining his stoicism and decency in the face of defeat; because it took the outstanding patriot he is, to accept the verdict and to respect the choice made by his people. Bourgeois democratic politics can be a pernicious school of learning; and it is not always the best man that wins.
The factors that differentiate defeat from victory can often be so subjective and flimsy, that those who track political psychology are obliged to learn its lessons with the detachment of science. And Ekiti taught some remarkable lessons last weekend, which must still be reverberating within the nation’s political circles as I write these lines.
This is because since the 1999 transition to civil rule, we have NEVER witnessed as comprehensive a defeat as Kayode Fayemi suffered in Ekiti state. Not only did he lose to Ayo Fayose, the PDP candidate, by 120, 433 votes to 203, 090, it was very significant that Fayemi did NOT win in ANY of the 16 local government areas of the state.  Something was certainly wrong!
I have spent time since the election reading EVERYTHING that I have seen on the Ekiti polls. I have also spoken with many civil society activists who were on ground in the lead to the election and were also monitors on Election Day and after. I spoke to some of Fayemi’s strategists and it became clearer to me, that we allowed our subjective wishes for Kayode’s re-election to cloud an objective assessment of Ekiti’s realities.
We failed one of Lenin’s basic requirements for understanding social phenomena: “Concrete analysis of concrete situations”! Hindsight is 20/20 and with hindsight, it seemed that Fayemi never connected with the mass of his people. He was seen to be elitist, an intellectual who lived in the rarified world of the intellect, unable to come down to the levels of the mass.
Politics and perception
And in politics, perception is everything! This contrasted with the populist, even lumpen propensities of his opponent, Ayo Fayose, who understood mob psychology and would, without batting an eyelid, stop to drink palmwine with Okada riders or eat pounded yam with taxi drivers; dance on the street and if needs be, brawl and pick a fight.
In a society where the majority of the population has become very young, Ayo Fayose was able to mass mobilise the youth and the most iconic picture of the Ekiti election, was that queue of very young people, each holding a bag of rice, emblazoned with Ayo Fayose’s name.
It was poor imitation and a desperate one, that a few days to the election, Fayemi and his wife Bisi, started serving elderly people cooked rice. It was too little too late. Cooked rice was no match for the bag of rice that people could cook in their homes several times! Fayemi clearly lost the Ekiti “Rice War”, as prelude to losing the electoral battle.
I think a missing factor in our practice of liberal, bourgeois democracy, is the careful analysis of the political psychology of the demographic groups in our society. Today, 63% of our population is under the age of 25, while 75% is under 35.
This broad demographic group was born under military dictatorship, with its cultures of violence, impunity and worship of the cult of ill-gotten money. They never experienced a Nigeria that functioned with an ethos of decency and hardwork.
They have grown up within a political and economic culture where those able to exploit the frailties of society have excelled; where honest labour does not seem to pay and those who have succeeded are brigands and crooks. So an ethos of grab what you can, how you can, when you can, has become very much ingrained in many of our youth, who do not have many positive role models to look up to and copy.
So sundry criminal activities have become the avenue to live a life of unearned luxuries. This cynicism also percolates into the political culture. Politicians are followed, especially when they have the populist tendency to dole out money and bags of rice.
Knowing that there won’t be accountability once they get into power, these young supporters try to grab as much as possible in return for their votes. It is what in Hausa is described as “Sha Yanzu, Magani Yanzu”! Fayemi was unable to mobilise this constituency of cynicism that his opponent, Ayo Fayose, did magnificently and reaped aplenty!
Incumbency literally became a disadvantage for Fayemi, as many of his confidants became albatrosses who lost in their various local governments, revealing how much they had alienated their principal from the people. Kayode Fayemi ran a very beautiful campaign on social media, and would certainly have won, if that was a vital factor, but it was clear that the effect was almost nil on the ground in his state. And when the Ekiti diaspora in Lagos and surrounding states returned home to vote against their governor, it became a total rejection of what he stood for and the message of development that he was painfully unable to communicate to the people in his state.
A civil society activistwas told in Ekiti, that intellectuals like Fayemi, loved humanity so much, that they couldn’t translate that love to real human beings!The assertion was in respect of the difficulty that Fayemi had with teachers over the Teachers Needs Development Assessment Tests; the restiveness of civil servants and those who were hurt during his urban renewal programme.
Anything that negatively touched livelihood in a basically civil service and peasant society was likely to be severely punished at the polls. And it was!
Loathing and rejection in Southwest politics
The new theme in the politics of the Southwest is the increasing loathing for and rejection of the domineering presence of Bola Tinubu. It manifested in neighbouring Ondo state during Olusegun Mimiko’s re-election and was also a factor in Ekiti.
I have read a correspondence, where people said Ayo Fayose was not a credible candidate, but they voted for him, as an expression of disgust with Bola Tinubu’s overbearing presence. They did not want to be vassals of a lord based on Bourdillon Avenue, Ikoyi, Lagos. And so complete was Fayemi’s rout, that Bola Tinubu who had threatened election riggers with lynching, has been unable to find his voice to comment on the Ekiti debacle since Saturday.
He is still shell shocked! But going forward, the deceitful Tinubu factor must be carefully interrogated so as not to haunt the APC into the future. There were reports in the days before the election of the militarisation of the state, while APC governors were prevented from entry into Ekiti to attend Fayemi’s final rally.
They were also unable to take in money for a last minute inducement of the voters, which left the scene completely to the PDP and Fayose. But in truth, the background of the total rout had been laid in the months and weeks before the polls. It was instructive that elections monitors commended the preparations for and the conduct of the polls by INEC. So that was not an element of worry at all in Ekiti last weekend.
It was the complete nature of the defeat, which made it easy for Kayode Fayemi to graciously accept defeat thus helping to open up a new vista of development of Nigeria’s political process.
That act will resonate into the future and will help ensure his legacy as a patriot and democrat. But the painful lessons of a complete electoral rout, the type of which we have never seen before in Nigeria, since 1999, must be learnt by all those dedicated to a politics of principled alternatives in Nigeria.
Understanding of real politik
No one in politics should take the people for granted. This is especially important for those who come from a progressive background. There must be an understanding of ‘Real Politik’; while the felt needs of the people should be central to political decision and policy thrust.
In the long run, as Amilcar Cabral used to warn, people would not make sacrifices for ideas in our heads, no matter how lofty those ideas might be. Ayo Fayose has taught very poignant lessons in mobilization and the practice of politics as an art of being in touch with the mass of the people.
Charismatic individuals are able to build organic links to the feelings of the people and can sway them in directions of their choosing. It is not often or necessary, that those abilities are directed in progressive directions. But those who make claims to progressive politics must learn how to effectively connect with the felt needs of the people to build the blocks of the different politics they talk about.
Kayode Fayemi had the best ideas but unfortunately, he was too alienated from the people and was therefore unable to get the people to buy into and own his vision. He was ruthlessly exposed and fatally routed by the same people he wanted to work for.
It was a sad political knockout for a genuine patriot. But those who are politically wise must learn very useful lessons from Ekiti state and Kayode Fayemi’s annihilation into the future!


Wednesday, 25 June 2014

Nigeria: Borno Govt - We Have No Facts On Abduction of Women and Children

This Day (Lagos)

BY JOHN SHIKLAM AND SENATOR IROEGBU

Borno State Governor, Alhaji Kashim Shettima said Tuesday that he was yet to get sufficient facts on the abduction of scores of women and children alleged to have been abducted a few days ago from parts of his state.
The media was awash on Monday and yesterday with reports of the kidnapping of between 60 and 91 women and children from Kumugza village in Damboa Local Government Area of Borno State as well as some villages in Askira/Uba Local Government Area, which shares a border with Chibok.
However, in a statement issued yesterday by the governor's media aide, Isa Gusau, the state government said: "Governor Kashim Shettima has read with serious concern, media reports about yet another abduction in part of Damboa local Government Area of Borno State.
"The governor has since directed the chairman of the affected local government area and other government officials from the affected areas to make very urgent but accurate enquiries from communities and report to him as soon as they can, even as security agencies take appropriate actions.
"While the governor views the reported abduction with all the seriousness it deserves, he is also worried that weighty developments such as information concerning the abduction of 60 persons requires careful enquiry in order to obtain information that is comprehensive and beyond any reasonable doubt.
"The governor is worried that only recently, leaders of Miyetti Allah Cattle Breaders Association were reported to have refuted media reports that some 30 fulani women were kidnapped at a community in Chibok.
"The association relied on what it called comprehensive investigation that involved making enquiries from all of its members not only in the area the kidnap was said to have taken place but also in the entire Borno State.
"The governor very much appreciates the urge of the media to inform the public about happenings not only in Borno State but everywhere in the world given the fact that the public has a right to know and they ought to be informed.
"However, he feels the Nigerian is competent enough to deploy means by which comprehensive and accurate information can be gotten. The governor appreciates that both the media and government at all levels, are working in unusual ways given the nature of the unfortunate insurgency that have remained persistent in some parts of Borno State.
"He knows and understands the difficulty but at the same time, he calls for patience at all times so that collectively, the media and government can in giving out information, be sure of exactly what happened, how it happened, when and who is or are involved.
"Governor Shettima stands by those who have been affected and shares their pains and those of their families even as we await the outcome of enquiries going on, hoping the outcome will be as soon as possible, without compromising accuracy of information."
Shettima also expressed hope that the schoolgirls abducted in Chibok would, by the intervention of God, be rescued and "so will those recently affected, if ongoing enquiries confirm reports about the unfortunate incident".
The statement from Gusau was in line with the information obtained by the state government sources on Monday night that they were unaware of the abduction of scores of women and children from parts of the state.
In a text message responding to THISDAY enquiries, a Borno State Government official said: "I do not think there is any truth to the story on the abduction of the women and children. We are making enquiries from all the relevant authorities and will revert (back) to you tomorrow (yesterday) morning."
Also, security sources in the state said they were unaware of the abduction of the women and children from Damboa Local Government Area.
A security official, who spoke to THISDAY last night, said the village head of Damboa was in Maiduguri yesterday, but had not made any complaint about any abduction from his community.
"Damboa was attacked almost 10 days ago by Boko Haram which was reported in the media. We are not aware of another attack since then, not to add last week. If the abduction took place 10 days ago, then we would have known since," he said.
However, a text message forwarded to THISDAY yesterday by another source in the Borno State Government from the chairman of the council said verbatim: "... last week attack on Kumugza village which bh (Boko Haram) abducted over 74 women and killed almost 10 men, but all press are calling me but I reserved my comments to them."
FG Blamed for Failure to Rescue Girls Meanwhile, the United States has said the Nigerian government should be held responsible for the lack of progress in rescuing the 219 teenage girls who were abducted from their secondary school in Chibok, Borno State, over two months ago.
Speaking on the assistance being rendered by the US government in the search and rescue operation for the girls, Ambassador Phillip Carter of the U.S. African Command (AFRICOM) confirmed that his government was only assisting the Nigerian government on the kidnapping.
Carter, who spoke yesterday at the 6th US Africa Command Academic Symposium in Accra, Ghana, said: "We were asked by the leadership of Nigeria to provide help to the Nigerian government to deal with the horrible phenomenon, Boko Haram.
"We have an inter-agency, inter-government effort with the Nigerian government run through our embassy in Abuja under our ambassador." He said AFRICOM's core engagement with Nigeria includes locating the girls and improving the Nigerian security forces' capacity to manage information.
"AFRICOM is not leading Nigerian soldiers to do anything. We are not putting any equipment on the ground. We are only to support them. That is the direction of President Obama and the request of President Jonathan," he said.
He explained some of the command's activities on the continent, stating that AFRICOM had no intensions of militarising Africa, the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reported.
He said AFRICOM is a geographic combatant command of the US Defence Department and is focused on military relations with African states and other regional security organisations on the continent. Also speaking during the event, the representative of the Ghanaian Minister of Defence, Mark Woyongo, bemoaned the mixed results achieved by security operatives in the sub-region.
"This year's theme which is titled Perspectives and Partners on Population-Centric Security Sector Transformation is both timely and topical because of the contemporary security challenges facing our region and Africa as a whole," he said.
California Special Forces Train Nigerian Army It also emerged yesterday that Special Forces troops from the California Army National Guard are currently in Nigeria training a newly formed infantry battalion designed specifically to counter the threat from Boko Haram.
"The Nigerian army's 143rd Infantry Battalion was formed from the ground up within the past few months," said one CNG Special Forces soldier, whose name has been withheld for security reasons.
"This is a classic Special Forces mission - training an indigenous force in a remote area in an austere environment to face a very real threat. We know that within a short time after leaving here, it's more than likely the 143rd Infantry Battalion will be in a fight."
Not only is this deployment a first-of-its-kind mission for the California Army National Guard, it is a first for the US Army.
US troops have previously trained Nigerian battalions for United Nations peacekeeping missions, but this time the Nigerian government requested full-spectrum operational training for its new 650-man battalion.
A total of 12 California Guard soldiers from two Los Alamitos-based Special Forces units - Special Operations Detachment-U.S. Northern Command and Company A, 5th Battalion, 19th Special Forces Group (Airborne) - deployed for a two-month mission, the first in a three-phase plan to assist in the establishment of the 143rd.
"It is not peacekeeping," Col. John D. Ruffing, chief of US Army Africa's Security Cooperation Division, said about the 143rd's mission. "It is every bit of what we call 'decisive action,' meaning those soldiers will go in harm's way to conduct counter-insurgency operation in their country to defeat a known threat, and it's all purely funded by the Nigerians."
Among the skills being taught by the California Guard's Special Forces units are fundamentals of patrolling, small-unit tactics, movement to contact, night operations and ambush tactics.
The Nigerian soldiers will also receive instruction on human rights, basic soldiering skills, advanced infantry skills, land navigation, marksmanship and troop-leading procedures.
"We want these soldiers to be able to take the fight to the enemy in restricted terrain and really impact the threat within their borders so that they can then provide more resources to peacekeeping operations, which Nigeria has extensive experience with," the CNG's team leader said.
In addition to training the 143rd soldiers, the Special Forces troops are continuously developing Nigerian cadre as primary instructors, so they can train other Nigerian forces after the CNG troops depart. "This is a huge benefit - that we're able to (improve} the Nigerian capacity to help with training themselves," said Lt. Col. Vinnie Garbarino, US Army Africa's (USARAF) international military engagements officer.
"I think this is going to be the first of a couple of battalion training efforts that the Nigerians are going to undertake, so training their own trainers is huge because it offsets the student-to-instructor ratio. Our 12 guys don't go very far; when you add 40 Nigerian cadre members to the equation, they are doing some heavy lifting."
The information exchange, however, is not a one-way street, one California Guard soldier said.
"We're trying to help them, but also to learn from them," he said. "The US answer may not work perfectly in Africa, and maybe the Nigerian techniques wouldn't be applicable in Afghanistan or Iraq. We're sharing capabilities, and hopefully the Rangers of the 143rd Infantry Battalion will be in a position to share these skills with other units in the Nigerian army."
Maj. Liam Connor, US Army Africa's West Africa Desk officer, said the US Army worked for several months to come up with a programme of instruction that stayed within a limited budget. The training was specifically requested by Nigerian forces to take them out of a peacekeeping mission-set and counter Boko Haram, he said.
"We hope to ... instill a controlled, aggressive spirit necessary to increase their training level and capability to close with and eliminate Boko Haram," a California Guard soldier said.
"The current threats from Boko Haram warrant an increased capability that currently does not fully exist within Nigerian forces." The California Guard training mission is only one piece of a greater effort to achieve a shared vision in the region.
"We're helping Nigeria and its neighbors to develop a Boko Haram strategy," said Maj. Albert Conley III, a USARAF spokesman.
"The key is [Nigeria and its neighbors] have to create the strategy. It can't be a US-directed strategy, so we are helping them facilitate the creation of strategy, development of a strategy, and then once they do that, helping modify that strategy to make sure it's hitting the end states everyone wants."
Gunmen Kill 38 in Kaduna In another development, no fewer than 38 people have been killed in separate attacks on two villages in Sanga Local Government Area of Kaduna State.
It was learnt that the attacks on the two villages - Kabamu in Karshi district and Ankpong in Nandu district - took place simultaneously at about 10 pm on Monday by Fulani herdsmen.
Several other people were said to have sustained injuries from gunshots during the attack and were rushed to the hospital.
Chairman of Sanga, Mr. Emmanuel Adamu, who confirmed the incident in a telephone interview, described it as unfortunate and condemnable. Adamu, who disclosed that 21 people were killed by the gunmen in Kabamu village while 17 others were killed at Ankpong village, added that the attackers, believed to be Fulani herdsmen, invaded the two villages for about four hours.
While condoling with the families of those that lost their loved ones, the council chairman called on the people of the area to remain calm as security measures were being taken to forestall further reoccurrence. Kaduna State Governor, Alhaji Mukhtar Yero, also condemned the attack, describing it as a "provocative attempt by some unpatriotic people to cause confusion and unrest in Kaduna State".
Yero, in a statement by his Director-General, Media and Publicity, Ahmed Maiyaki, condoled with the families of victims of the attack and called on the people of the area to remain calm as security forces had already been deployed to maintain law and order.
The statement further said security agencies had been directed to commence investigation into the matter, adding that "no stone shall be left unturned in the resolve to bring perpetrators of this attack and all other criminal assault on our people in the past to justice."
However, in its reaction, the Concerned Realists of Southern Kaduna said the state government was incapable of tackling the persistent attacks on Southern Kaduna people and called for the declaration of a state of emergency in the state.
The group, in a statement signed by its convener, Dr. John Danfulani, alleged that there is a monumental failure in handling security issues in Southern Kaduna by the federal and Kaduna State governments.
"We make bold to state that the government of Kaduna State is inciting a crisis like we saw in the Chawai Chiefdom where two persons lost their lives at the weekend, following the forceful appointment of a traditional ruler in spite of the fact that there was a pending court case concerning the traditional stool," he said.
40 Boko Haram Suspects Arrested The attack in Kaduna coincided with the arrest of 40 suspected Boko Haram militants in northern Cameroun, the Voice of America (VOA) has reported. During the arrests, soldiers reportedly sealed off a market believed to be a storehouse for arms and ammunition used by Boko Haram at the country's border with Nigeria.
"A gendarme raid on the Maroua Central Market has led to the arrest of over 40 people," VOA quoted a state radio broadcaster as announcing.
"The arrests are in connection with ongoing investigations into the activities of the Boko Haram group in the far northern region of the country."
According to the officer who supervised the arrests, Colonel Nyemeck Pierre, the Camerounian government ordered the military action, as part of its fight against Boko Haram's activities in the country.
"It is the duty of the military to filter the population so that enemies do not infiltrate Cameroun," he said. "The matter is complicated because along the border, there are Nigerians and Camerounians who belong to the same families; and soldiers have to try to distinguish who is a militant."
The arrest comes 23 days after Camerounian soldiers killed at least 40 Boko Haram militants operating inside its border with Nigeria.

Tuesday, 24 June 2014

A Muslim/Muslim presidential disaster for the APC

Vanguard News - Latest updates from Nigeria, including business, politics, entertainment, fashion, health, technology, naija lifestyle
– Femi Aribisala

Bola Tinubu is standing on the horns of a dilemma.  He became the godfather of the APC out of burning personal ambition to seek greener political pastures for himself in Abuja.  The APC calculus is to present a Northern presidential and Southern vice-presidential ticket against the PDP’s Jonathan/Sambo ticket in the 2015 presidential election.  If that APC vice-presidential candidate is not Tinubu himself, then all bets are off as far as Tinubu is concerned.  However, the prospect of a ticket with Tinubu as vice-president is already ensuring that the APC is badly in need of aspirin.
An APC vice-president that is not Tinubu poses grave political danger to Tinubu.  It means Tinubu has been sowing for somebody else to reap.  If that person happens to be Yoruba, he or she could quickly become a contender for Tinubu’s much-vaunted position as the Asiwaju of South-West politics in Nigeria.  That is the reason why Tinubu schemed against Mulikat Akande  becoming the Speaker of the House of Representatives.  Therefore, all systems are “go.”  Tinubu must be APC’s vice-presidential candidate by hook or crook.  If not, it is most likely Tinubu will end up by scheming against the APC in the coming presidential election.
Truncated democracy
The first imperative is to ensure that the chairman of the APC must be someone Tinubu can manipulate.  Therefore, he insisted that Bisi Akande, the former ACN chairman well-schooled in Tinubu’s gamesmanship, must be retained as APC chairman.  Those were the days when Tinubu’s word was law in ACN.  But now in APC, he got into a shouting match with Tom Ikimi, who insisted the APC chairman must come from the South-South.  Tinubu lost out to the new power-brokers of the APC governors.  Bisi Akande resigned and the post was zoned to the South-South.
Then phase two of the battle began.  Tinubu needed to ensure that the APC chairman is not his new arch-enemy, Tom Ikimi, a known Atiku Abubakar man.  So he shopped for a more malleable alternative.  He finally settled on John Odigie-Oyegun, former governor of Edo State.  But when the permutations were done, Odigie-Oyegun could not be assured of victory in a democratic poll.  The answer, therefore, in typical Asiwaju fashion, was to truncate democracy in APC.
Tinubu engaged in backroom deals whereby, instead of electing a new APC chairman, Odigie-Oyegun was rigged into the office.  APC governors went along with this charade out of fear Tinubu might otherwise lose interest in the APC and deny it of valuable South-West support.  The lie was sold to the convention that all other candidates had agreed to step down for Odigie-Oyegun.  As a result, he was declared the new consensus chairman of the party.
Ikimi’s exposure
However, Tom Ikimi refused to play ball.  He not only boycotted the convention, he announced that the whole thing was 419, ACN style.  Ikimi declared that the election was rigged principally by Tinubu, who he claimed “unilaterally” appointed Odigie-Oyegun as party-chairman.  Said Ikimi: “I did not step down for anybody. When it became clear to me and many others, including my supporters, that the outcome of the contest would not be determined by a free and fair vote at the convention, most of the delegates, tired and weary after waiting for more than 24 hours for accreditation all day at Eagle Square, departed.”
Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad.  The APC plan for a Muslim/Muslim ticket in this day and age in Nigeria is nothing short of madness.
Ikimi went further to reveal that the entire scam is designed to pave the way for a Muslim/Muslim APC presidential ticket with the Asiwaju himself as Muslim vice-presidential candidate.  Hear Ikimi: “I felt strongly that if we were bound to proceed on the basis of zoning that both party offices as well as key offices in government such as President, Vice President etc., should be put on the table and zoned at the same time. My suggestion was motivated by strong information I had received of plots being hatched to steamroll a Muslim/Muslim Presidential and Vice Presidential ticket for the APC in the 2015 election and with specific individuals in mind as the beneficiaries.”
This plot is not just thickening: it is also unraveling.  Tom Ikimi is not just an ordinary member of the APC.  He is one of the founding-members.  As a matter of fact, he presided over the negotiations leading to the merger of the different parties that make up the congress.  So what we have here is more than speculative.  It is coming from one of the APC insiders.
APC delusion
Femi Fani-Kayode also left the APC for the same reason.  Stating publicly the reason for his departure, Fani-Kayode declared: “I am a devout and committed Christian and I cannot remain in a party where a handful of people that have sympathies for Boko Haram and that have a clear Islamic agenda are playing a leading role. This is made all the more untenable when some of those people are working hard silently and behind the scenes to impose a Muslim/Muslim ticket on the party for the Presidential elections next year.”
Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad.  The APC plan for a Muslim/Muslim ticket in this day and age in Nigeria is nothing short of madness.  It will not fly.  It will not only be rejected outright by Nigerians, it will tear the APC apart.  Indeed, it is already beginning to do so.  Bola Tinubu cannot be elected vice-president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.  He cannot even win a free and fair election in Lagos today.  That is how unpopular he has become in his South-West heartland.  It did not help matters that he was quoted as insulting virtually all Yoruba traditional rulers.  The defeat of sitting APC governor of Ekiti State, Kayode Fayemi, by opposition PDP candidate, Ayo Fayose, is surely handwriting on the wall.  Tinubu cannot deliver the South-West to the born-to-rule Northern cabals of the APC.
It is amazing how the political ambitions of some individuals can completely blind them to the political reality of present-day Nigeria.  A situation where some terrorists are holding the country and 219 Christian girls hostage by insisting that Nigeria must become an Islamic Republic does not permit the scheming of a political party that insists power must return to the North to present a presidential ticket where both the president and vice-president are Muslims.  This would surely be interpreted by Christians and Muslims alike as capitulation to Boko Haram.  It would also confirm the suspicions of some that the APC is sympathetic to the Boko Haram cause.
Abiola/Kingibe precedence
The argument that the Muslim/Muslim ticket of Abiola/Kingibe was accepted by Nigerians in 1993 is disingenuous.  That ticket was accepted because the presidential candidate, Abiola, was from the South; and he was running against Bashir Tofa, another Muslim but from the North.  2014 is not 1993.  A Muslim/Muslim APC ticket today would combine the insistence that power must return to the predominantly Muslim North, with yet another political incendiary; the Islamisation of Nigeria according to a Boko Haram agenda.
This would not only fail, it would be politically disastrous.  It would ensure that the 2015 election will be fought on religious grounds.  It would then become apparent to everyone, Christian and Muslim alike, that Nigeria needs to be protected from the APC.  The very fact that major power-brokers in the APC are even seriously entertaining this idea is eloquent testimony that the APC is up to no good.  The religious situation in Nigeria today is particularly delicate, especially given the malicious bombing of churches and killing of Christians by Muslim insurgents in the North.  How then can a political party that aspires to rule the entire country be so insensitive to the prevailing situation?
Elections are not about choosing between the best alternatives.  Most times, they are about choosing between bad alternatives.  The PDP and the APC are both lousy options.  If we had the druthers, we would say “a plague on both their houses.”  Unfortunately, they are the only viable choices available to Nigerians in the coming elections.  Forced to choose between the two, there can be no question that the PDP is by far the lesser evil.
APC sectarianism
APC is a party of convenience.  It is the party of autocratic political masqueraders pretending to be democrats.  It is the party of power-hungry politicians with regional agendas.  It is a party of those inclined to plunge Nigeria into sectarianism because personal ambition is given greater saliency over the national interest.  It is the party of those who have remained largely silent and complicit in the face of Boko Haram insurgency.  It is the party of those who are inclined to use the national tragedy of the kidnapping of innocent Chibok schoolgirls for party-political gain.
The very fact that Fani-Kayode felt the need to protest to the powers-that-be in the APC that “the APC is not an affiliate of Al Qaeda and neither is it a Boko Haram party, a Janjaweed party or a Muslim Brotherhood Party” shows it is beginning to be perceived as one or all of the above.  In life, perceptions are often more important than reality.  It is a testament to the disdain with which the APC holds Nigerians that it is doggedly refusing to address these growing perceptions.  On the contrary, it seems inclined to confirm them.
Catch-22
The APC is in a catch-22 situation.  If it does not field Buhari as presidential candidate, it will lose invaluable Northern support that only Buhari seems able to guarantee.  If it does not field Tinubu as its vice-presidential candidate, it will lose Tinubu’s ostensible South-West coattails.  The answer is the political suicide of a Buhari/Tinubu ticket, since both politicians are Muslims.  Whatever the permutations, an APC presidential ticket that includes Tinubu will end up as a Muslim/Muslim ticket, because the APC does not have a viable Northern Christian presidential candidate.
In the meantime, the APC is going to provide the political Nollywood of the coming months.  The upshot of these shenanigans is not only that the APC will come to grief in the coming presidential elections, but that Bola Tinubu will lose his meal-ticket in the South-West